In 2005 we had many scientists out to prove or disprove the big bang theory for the birth of the Universe. Although we may never know for sure many astrophysicists are following inline with Steven Hawking's comments on the matter when he indicated that;

We believe there was a big bang although we cannot prove it, and that he believes there was a big bang and thus this leaves an unanswered question; if there was a big bang, then what went bang? Since we cannot know that, it is best to move on and discover things we can prove and know.

Others propose that the Universe expands and contracts within a flexible membrane where the energy is controlled by opposing forces and where other dimensions may come into play from time to time affecting our known world.

Throughout 2006 we will see alternate theories to the big bang float throughout the scientific community such as the "firecracker Effect” where the Universe expands to its maximum point and unable to expand any further star

ts closing in on itself and as it does more and more collisions occur until there are so many collisions and energy that the Universe is forced to expand again.

Such a theory suggests that the expanding and contracting of the Universe is ongoing and that one big bang does not occur but rather millions of smaller bangs every so many billions of Earth years and thus it is a perpetual motion machines which never ends. Think on this in 2006.

 Previous      Next