I don't read enough trading literature anymore to know if this is an accepted term. It seems I picked it up somewhere, but I can't be sure. At best I invented it on my own, at worst I am misusing a term popular in the trading vernacular, thereby confusing everyone. However, even if the term is wrong the idea is right.
For those of you reading my blog you are seeing the word hitch, and the term hitching quite a lot recently. This is being written 03/05/06, and I want to explain more thoroughly. Hitching is nothing more than a prices inability to follow through on a price move. If a price is rallying then it's logical conclusion is the upper bollinger band or the upper stochastic zone. They can, of course, go further, but that is not the focus here. In narrow trading range markets, price action often does not complete its rally, at least on the first try. And you see many, many patterns orbiting around the 20 day moving average, like it has a hitch in its get along. Therefore the name. The price action has a hitch. One can look at the patterns and it is easy to imagine that the moving average has a gravitational zone, and the prices are just orbiting.
This can also work for prices you expect to decline, They move down nicely until a little below the moving average and just hover there. Do they go up from here or down? Much of it depends on the pull of the market in general, or at least the sector of the stock in question. And be very aware that some sector pulls are stronger than others.
So what to do when you notice hitching behavior? Well, if you are clairvoyant you should stay out, go on vacation, read a book, wait for some sort of move that shows promising trades. I
CT Larsen has been trading stocks since 1990. Now trading large cap stocks exclusively. He has recorded three straight years of greater than 50% annual returns. You can read his blog at http://livingonlargecaps.blogspot.com